This guy has a pretty strong case:

http://www.thenuclearproctologist.org/

I'm not sure I see what he's getting at...

He's allegedly got information from "Health Canada" but the grammar, wording, etc. does not look like it was written by a government publication...in fact it looks photo shopped...

Some of the photos he's showing are of thermal images of the oceans...not of radiation dispersion...and he has piles of photos which I really dont know how he's concluding there is radiation all over Canada....

This looks more like a "conspiracy theory" website. Its just a bunch of "stuff" put together on a website...

I'll ask again...is there any reliable sources of information that show Fukashima as a concern?

@ thecrownsown - I will admit I am no expert on the topic, nor did I read through the entire website. I as well found it hard to fallow.

On the other hand I did admire this person for getting out there and putting feet on the ground.

I only came across him from coming across his boat in the harbour so I thought I'd just pass along his website and let other's digest it.

That being said I did start to take notice as I looked around the docks and beaches for myself. I can Confirm there is a large amount of marine life missing as he sates. What is causing it? Who knows... that's open to debate.