<<<Are you confused by what is going on in the Middle East? Let me explain.
We support the Iraqi government in the fight against the Islamic State.
We don’t like IS, but IS is supported by Saudi Arabia, whom we do like.
We don’t like President Assad in Syria. We support the fight against him, but not IS, which is also fighting against him.
We don’t like Iran, but Iran supports the Iraqi government against IS.
So, some of our friends support our enemies and some of our enemies are our friends, and some of our enemies are fighting against our other enemies, whom we want to lose, but we don’t want our enemies who are fighting our enemies to win.
If the people we want to defeat are defeated, they might be replaced by people we like even less. And all this was started by us invading a country to drive out terrorists who weren’t actually there until we went to drive them out?
Do you understand now? >>>
http://moneytalks.net//peters-content/13495-clear-as-mud.html
I don't know about you but to me it's more clear now what's going on over there :D. The only thing I don't understand is how the saudis can support a monstrosity like ISIS
It's nice to see that others are asking the same questions that I do. I'm sure that there is an agenda, it's just that we haven't sorted what it is. It must be to keep the middle east weak by battling each other. Maybe we fear that if all the Muslims united, they'd be too strong a force to reckon with. But it does appear that the Saudi's are likely on the same page as the US or they'd have been at each others throats by now.
Why can't there be at least one of these conflicts where we can get fully behind our government knowing that we truly are only there to help. Instead we find real proof that our neighbour has dirtied their hands in each one. Also knowing that the war is being fought with many US made weapons doesn't help calm the doubts of thinking were being played.
Ever since 9/11, our world has been continually filled with conspiracy theories as each event lead to the next, leaving a trail of suspicion in it's wake for all to step over as we were fed more patriotic speech. Even though it took weeks for ground zero to cool from the lake of molten metal which pooled at it's base, no one dared to ask aloud why it was even there! We did not want to hear the answer......
I am pleased to hear that both the Liberal and NDP stated today that they won't back Harper's plans to partake in the Syrian conflict. This is because it is hard to see the whole picture of what is really going on. I did a review of the previous conflict back in 2013 as a refresher to see if there were similar discrepancies to better sort things out. It is hard to follow some of this stuff further now but I do remember this following video and found it worked as a quick refresher flashback. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nE2kMWNJomo
The US quickly dropped the issue of the use sarin gas and that alone was suspicious. It was the accumulation of similar suspicious events that eventually lost them public backing and therefore the planned invasion of Syria never cam to pass.
Yet here we are again and motives are again interfering with the story at hand. Seems that it is hard to have a lie ready for every question asked to explain events leading to this place in time. That is what often happens when one tells a lie, right? You weave a story to justify an action, but you miss a detail that places doubt upon the lie told...so you tell another lie to cover for the last one....and soon enough the lie becomes more obvious to all. This is why the truth is so much easier to tell. The justifications are so much easier to explain when they are true ones and therefore far easier for the listeners to accept.
The following is from Iran news so you can see their view on US intervention in Syria.
- Press TV: what are Turkey's intentions in Syria? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=frODQq0ObGs
Is Turkey just following orders from their US counterparts? Iran has warned them not to intervene.
- Press TV: A debate on Turkey's role in Syria https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sa3l7tepaZA
Is this a ploy to take over Syria?
- Press TV: Syrian army retakes 3 villages https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2h7Ksp7j1N0
They do this on their own without US aid as they don't work together. Their reasoning is the US is trying to impose their own government after they destroy ISIL.
John Stewart rips into Obama's F*ck ya ISIS speech https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_SUfmxpOiWk 😀