He has a book out called "what really happened on the moon" free at amazon.com

The book you are referencing was not written by Niel Armstrong. It is a work of fiction.

The book you are referencing was not written by Niel Armstrong. It is a work of fiction.

I have downloaded it from amazon.com...it is written by Neil A. and is called What really happened on the moon and is a free download...but it does say Based on a true story..(only 6 chapters long)

The Name Neil A. is an attempt to make you think it was Niel Armstrong. Neil was a well read, doctor of engineering. The book is (I have only read the reviews, not the book) apparently poorly written. Neil would not have produced such a poorly written book. He would most certainly never produce a moon landing conspiracy book.

You're probably right. When the US FedGov chooses their candidates for lifelong lies, they choose pretty well. There are some staunch loyalists for the state.

The money and fame doesn't hurt either. Some people want to be immortalized in history, given that chance - they aren't going to screw it up.

Neil Armstrong was a brave, courageous and humble man. He did not seek fame or fortune for his achievements. He quietly went on to teach engineering at the University of Cincinnati, ran a farm and raise a family. He was a patriot and a real genuine hero, and YES, he really did land on the moon. I know there are some who still cling to this hoax nonsense, but you would think that reason, evidence, and common sense could prevail in such things... Well we all know where this discussion will go, so rather than hijack this forum with woo woo conspiracy theories, let's get back to our scheduled programming.

If I didnt know any better, I'd think there's a man crush going on.

And the Pres is a natural born citizen too...... 🙂

You guys are too easy to mess with..... 😀 😀

Peace bro.

ya alright...another thread I seem to be finished with

ya alright...another thread I seem to be finished with

Yup....

There must be some sort of icon that can be put on threads that would warn the thin skinned and overly serious that the enclosed content will not likely help their prepping endevours and that they should, "move along, nothing to see here". Now I know what your thinking, "but Antsy, the title was Neil Armstrong and how could they possibly think a deceased Neil would help their prepping?!?" You might even suggest that if there are valued members who insist on reading every post from every province and even country, that they will obviously find threads whose humour or content doesn't grab them. I would just assert that an icon that sent the same message as an "M" on a video game might ward off our peers whose sensitivities are greater than the potential content will warrant. Now I'm not talking about 'cussing' and graphic violence, just something like the suggestion that the moon landing was a hoax, or that 911 was more (or less) than it seemed to see who jumps.

Antsy

It isn't about the topic of Neil Armstrong nor is it about seeing who jumps. It is about somehow jumping to the conclusion that "there is a man crush going on" relating to any discenting opinion and "you guys are too easy to mess with"... I didn't think this was about baiting people then jumping on their responses. Regardless of which province or country things come from, respect and civility is universal and has no bearing on what is deemed humorous. Are you suggesting we censor and label posts deemed on our personal views and what we think others will find acceptable? I think if you have to do that then the post shouldn't be on here. Just my 2 cents.

ya alright...another thread I seem to be finished with

A wise move for all.

Houston,...... We Erased The Apollo 11 Tapes

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=106637066

I would like to know more about the lack of displaced moon dust underneath the lunar module. And some of the shadows and lighting in some of the iconic photos seem a bit odd too.

There must be some sort of icon that can be put on threads that would warn the thin skinned and overly serious that the enclosed content will not likely help their prepping endevours and that they should, "move along, nothing to see here". Now I know what your thinking, "but Antsy, the title was Neil Armstrong and how could they possibly think a deceased Neil would help their prepping?!?" You might even suggest that if there are valued members who insist on reading every post from every province and even country, that they will obviously find threads whose humour or content doesn't grab them. I would just assert that an icon that sent the same message as an "M" on a video game might ward off our peers whose sensitivities are greater than the potential content will warrant. Now I'm not talking about 'cussing' and graphic violence, just something like the suggestion that the moon landing was a hoax, or that 911 was more (or less) than it seemed to see who jumps.

Antsy

I agree Antsy,

I think certain folks have been cheated. All the delusions and brain rot, without the euphoria.