well another thread blasted, or more correctly locked so it will drop away. Unfortunatly good posts are sometimes lost. The Crowns Own gave some very good info just before it was locked. I will repost it here.
Postby thecrownsown » Fri Mar 06, 2015 5:46 pm
Antsy wrote:Knowing how much we all like Youtube evidence to support our theories, I have the following which suggests what we can expect.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=itRbwbVTrzw
Antsy
I dont find Youtube as "legit" as Netflix, or Google as sources of reliable information and research. But I do thank you for bringing this particular evidence to my attention. I am unsure why others here would quickly accept other things on the net, yet so quickly and emphatically discount this. I ponder whether those that so challenge your post so quickly and boldy have a bigger agenda? Perhaps they themselves work for the New World Order? Making big splashes about military logistics and Ukraine to take our attention away from the real conspiracies out there? If you google some of the avatar names on this forum, or look them up on youtube...you come up with some very scary stuff....false flag events, lizard people.... 😆
Are you on Blackberry Messenger Channels?
Check out: Emergency Preparedness C00219488
I will second his advice as wise....I often say its all BS on the net, but that doesn't just apply to a lot of the info out there. People are often not what they appear and you would be a fool if you take some at face value. As crowns own said himself he has googled avatar names to learn more. Google works but if you have put your cross hairs on someone, and I have in my own province, (Those who have fancied themselves as leaders,but without abilities or those who spout nonsense) You need to be more thorough.
Make up a full profile based on all the posts given..in collums Find and list indicators regarding age, location, occupation, education, married or not, people give away lots of info, and just like a jigsaw puzzle a picture comes together, but google wont get you some of the best info. Public records for example that have been archived are the best. Lets say for example someone mentions they have a grid tied solar system and the only thing you know about them is roughly the geographic area they are in. maybe they have mentioned the size of it, or the date put in, but even without that extra info you can locate them as a hook up permit must be issued by the utility company (public document), often depending on the location of the city, or county, a hearing/notice is posted (again public document) These public documents are a gold mine...you will get their legal land description, full legal name, and sometimes spouse. That's the jackpot, with that you can find out more about them than you ever thought possible. Or perhaps they fancy a type of snow mobile, and by the profile of them you have determined that they like to boast, so it would be a reasonable conclusion that they would also belong on a snow mobile forums...you can then with a little searching track them there. Or they may as I have found with one individual in my province love to yap about their faith. Well again you can often pick them up on religious boards, often you will have to join these boards (use a throw away Hotmail account) as they somewhat like to hide from general viewing what they post, and after some of what I have read, why is very obvious.
Also as people often change avatar names they can still be trackable across forums, I wont mention all the ways I use but I will say some travel with others through internet land, and that's why you identify their internet/forum connections (social), that alone can explain the motivations for some posts and actions. I mention this as crownsown advice was good...protect yourself from the dissingenuine with alternative motives, and they are out there. I have met with people from the forum and I make sure its not with wack jobs, armed nut cases looking to bring about the rapture, those with criminal intent or prone to hate of one type or another. It seems this is a very timely post. (ides of March coming)
Give a man a gun, and he can rob a bank. Give a man a bank, and he can rob the world.
Just a point of clarification. My post was more of a tongue in cheek response with the frustration of continued "phoney intellectualism" by having the internet at hand, not really on any persons online activity. Google is not synonymous with research. It can be used as a research tool to a limited extent, but to often its simply used to find information that backs up ones own view instead of exploring a topic from all angles. We basically think we are thinking...when we are actually just rearranging our own bias. Forums don't help the cause either. The format always leads to a clash. Its just the way this particular type of social media works...
And for the record...as I thought it was pretty obvious..there were no ties to false flag events, etc. and to be honest I didn't google anyone's avatar name. Thats not my style. If you are intent on finding out the identity of someone on the forum...you need to look at yourself and ask if this is mentally healthy that you really need to care about that kind of stuff. Or...you can just ask that person what there name is. lol. Maybe they'll surprise you and tell you! 🙂
Though keeping one's anonymity in prepper circles seems like a staple, I have to admit I personally don't get hung up on it. I think using common sense and safety on the internet period is just smart and no one should ever divulge there name or personal details online...but the whole cloak and dagger concept I personally don't subscribe to. The local group meet in my area has been held at my home, we all use our real names...and to date no marauders, stalkers, roving bandits, or government agents have attempted to steal my rice and beans. 😉
Preppercorns comments though on internet safety are well said. I'm not sure about his reference to my advice. I dont think anything I said has related to this. But nonetheless, his comments about internet safety are good advice for online presence.
https://www.internationalpreppersnetwork.net/viewtopic.php?f=57&t=7738
thecrownsown, your advice was good, a shame you don't want to own it now. Though I must say you are to sharp, and have been on the board long enough to know the type of individuals I speak of, infact while they have moved to friendlier places with more of their own kind in internet land for the most part, the "type" shall we say does appear now and again. Infact a whole thread where such a person was called out for, lets just use the word extreamist type language was on this very board. I cant believe you missed it? If you go to look for it you will find that Denob has now removed it, thus is by default protecting such types from the bright light of inquiry. I have learned to save such type threads now as others have also been deleated so I can paste that entire thread here if you have forgotten it?
Your advice tongue in cheek or not is still good, You know in my province there was a individual who thought strutting about downtown Calgary with a rifle was a smart thing to do, unloaded ofcourse as he was not completely crazy 🙄 Now this was before my joining so I have read it after the fact but should such a type pop up in my area again you can be certain my crosshairs would fall on him (figuratively speaking).
Give a man a gun, and he can rob a bank. Give a man a bank, and he can rob the world.
Can you elaborate on your perspective Peppercorn? I got no clue what position you are taking. You take the term suspense to a whole new level.
I've said A LOT about myself on this forum. That's because I'm a law abiding citizen and loyal as hell to my country.I believe in the democratic process, and believe in the written word. I generally haven't wronged anyone and no not wish to.
There are quite a few maniacs that have ventured this forum, and others, I think part of that is brainwashing from the south, people getting confused about firearm clearance. So many of them associate what we think is psychopathic behaviour, IE carrying a pistol on your hip 24/7 as normal. Fantasizing about "Protectin' mah fam'ly" with a shotgun, ignoring the logistics behind these decisions, for example how are you going to protect your family from jail?
Can you elaborate on your perspective Peppercorn? I got no clue what position you are taking. You take the term suspense to a whole new level.
I've said A LOT about myself on this forum. That's because I'm a law abiding citizen and loyal as hell to my country.I believe in the democratic process, and believe in the written word. I generally haven't wronged anyone and no not wish to.
I really think I am clear but I quess not. I am only saying that if someone is raising concerns as to mental stability, or if you suspect they have other agendas, you can do a lot to investigate that, a awful lot, the internet is great tool for investigative purposes, as thecrownsown I guess inadvertently indicated, and singlecell, I am sure you have harmed no one, or intend to, so relax. Though now I am wondering why you are so worried (kidding).
Give a man a gun, and he can rob a bank. Give a man a bank, and he can rob the world.
I agree that alot of things can be discovered about an individual by means of using the Internet. Also that many can feign their intellect by means of quick reference if your into reciting another man's writings. But if another were to then reference their intellectual copy/paste comments themselves, their true colors would soon be obvious to all. That's the dilemma of the false intellect...the more said soon uncovers the falseness beneath.
The same can be said with any lie one tells. The more one adds to a lie, the more tracks one has to cover to protect the lie!
And yes, there is much to sift thru when quoting from others comments taken from the web. And TheCrown'sOwn's point that we tend to collect data to substantiate our own biases is indeed a point we should all ponder on as we post.... for there is substance in that comment. I'm sure that with enough searching, we could always find someone to quote from that mimmicks our own opinion. Well said!
I know I personally challenge my own opinions often, as much of the time they seem to contradict the what is considered the norm(and fed to them by mass media news). As stated in earlier threads, I use the same process I'd been taught in studying law in the military which is to divide evidence into hearsay, circumstantial or real evidence. Using logic from the real evidence gathered (that which you can see, hold,smell, etc), you can test theories drawn from the accumulation of circumstantial and hearsay evidence to know which path to follow further and which are likely dead ends. ( I could go further on this but it doesn't relate to the thread so I'll stop here).
The point I'm heading towards is that others might think I don't test my theories before posting. Seems I have admitted on various occasions when I haven't read all data such as reading Bill C-51, so I then related that I watched the Legislative debates instead. Seems this approach was still a worthy reference given... POINT: I answer direct questions with direct answers and I don't compensate with BS....
Usually when I post, I make it a point of showing proof by posting a YouTube video which always contains actual "REAL" evidence. The common response of a few persons is to jump in to profess YouTube is an unreliable source without ever actually challenging the evidence given and disprove it's validity.... Oh ya, and then some even jump on the old bandwagon by just proclaiming it as "conspiracy theory" as another escape from directly answering the point presented. This is a common political tactic used today by many politicians to subconsciously make the listeners automatically categorize the evidence presented as false without any further consideration. POINT: Seems others choose to duck the evidence presented. Seems to me their own biases prevent them from actually debating it's worthiness as they might then lose the argument and gain another prospective instead.
Salve,
Nemo nunc ipsum advenire ad longelocutum ad vocem tuam accipiendam potest, sed possis si velis nuntiam tradere dicendo simul ac sonitum audiveris. Memento sonitu praestolare.
Ave.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PtFVe1jVlJA
Needs must when the devil drives.